Nothing Phone (3): The $799 Disappointment That Breaks Our Hearts

Nothing Phone (3): The $799 Disappointment We Saw Coming

5 years of hype ends with a flagship that can't compete with Apple & Samsung

By Tech Gadget Orbit | July 2025 | 8 min read

Nothing Phone 3 showing glyph matrix and design flaws

🔥 The Harsh Truth: Nothing's first flagship phone arrives 5 years late to the $799 battle royale - and brings prototype-grade design, a gimmicky "Glyph Matrix," and performance that gets destroyed by the Galaxy S25. Here's why even die-hard fans should think twice.

The Great Design Letdown

Nothing's transparent aesthetic used to feel fresh. But the Phone (3)? It looks like an unfinished prototype someone left in the rain.

❌ What Went Wrong

  • The "spotty" back: Half-exposed NFC coils and misaligned components
  • Cheaper glass: Gorilla Glass 7i vs. Victus 2 on competitors
  • Unfinished energy: Like they rushed it out the door

✅ The Lone Bright Spot

  • Recording indicator light: Actually useful for privacy
  • IP68 rating: Finally flagship-grade water resistance
  • Aluminum frame: Matches premium competitors

Glyph Matrix: Solution Looking For A Problem

Nothing replaced their iconic light strips with a 489-LED "Matrix" - basically a tiny, monochrome second screen. After testing it for days, we're baffled.

✅ The Promise
See notifications without flipping phone
❌ The Reality
Still need to turn phone over to respond
✅ The Promise
Customizable "Glyph Toys"
❌ The Reality
Battery % display? While avoiding distractions?
✅ The Promise
Camera preview for selfies
❌ The Reality
Every phone with rear screen does this better
✅ The Promise
Contact-specific alerts
❌ The Reality
Shows David's face but not WHY he messaged

When your most practical feature (selfie preview) has been done better for years, and you're charging $799 for games of "spin the bottle" on a postage-stamp screen... something's wrong.

The Performance Compromise

Nothing chose the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 instead of the elite-tier chip. The result? Samsung mows it down:

  • 30-40% slower than Galaxy S25 in benchmarks
  • Zero advanced cooling for sustained performance
  • LTPS display (30Hz min) vs LTPO (1Hz) - worse battery efficiency

"If you play Genshin Impact or use intensive apps, the Phone (3) stutters while the S25 laughs. This isn't flagship performance - it's premium mid-range pretending."

The Battery Savior?

With a massive 5,150mAh battery, this might be its one advantage:

  • Outlasts iPhone 16 (3,500mAh) easily
  • Beats base Galaxy S25 (4,000mAh) by hours
  • 65W charging destroys Samsung's 25W

Software: The Only True Win

Nothing OS remains beautifully minimal:

✅ What Works

  • Bloatware-free Android (unlike Samsung)
  • Essential Search: Quick answers without app-hopping
  • 5 years OS + 7 years security updates

❌ What Doesn't

  • Essential Space: Confusing task manager
  • Half-baked AI: Gemini integration feels tacked on
  • Less customizable than Samsung's One UI

Cameras: Surprisingly Competent

The quad 50MP setup is shockingly good for the price:

  • Ultrawide holds detail better than Galaxy S25
  • 3x telephoto beats Samsung's sensor size
  • 10cm macro focus (improved from 15cm)
  • AI Super Res zoom beyond 30x

Irony alert: The best feature (selfie preview) requires the gimmicky Glyph Matrix.

▶️ Watch The Review

YouTube Thumbnail

The Brutal Verdict

6/10

Nothing Phone (3) isn't bad - it's just not flagship material. At $799, you expect to beat the competition, not make excuses. The Glyph Matrix feels like a downgrade, the design is messy, and the performance can't touch Samsung. Only buy if battery life is your #1 priority and you hate bloatware.

Previous Post Next Post